Do's and Don'ts of Successful Interviewing
Having spent a good number of years within the Staffing Industry, I have come to understand and believe in certain concepts and principles that relate directly to a Successfull Interview. These hold true, irrespective of the Industry, Role, Level of position and Interviewer.Here they are:Get there on Time - actually a couple of minutes before time. Not too early since you might appear to be desperate and definitely not late. Hopefully I do not have to say why. Obviously you are disrespecting the Interviewer's time by strolling in late. In case you are stuck in traffic, please call and apologize. On meeting with the interviewer, please apologize again to break the ice.Dress Professionally - it is always a pleasure interviewing a candidate that is professionally attired. What I mean by that is appropriate clothing. It does not matter if the company follows a Casual Dress Code or it is Casual Friday. You are there to conduct serious business and hence you must appear to be so.Smokers Beware - make sure that you do not have a smoke before the interview. You may not understand or realise, that as soon as you walk in, you blast the environment with the smell of your cigarette. Very annoying and discomforting and more so in the case of your interviewer being a Non smoker.Perfumes/Deodorant - aha! this is another No Brainer. Please for

Seeking Out Alternative Advertising to Pay-Per-Click Services
Pay-per-Click advertising has become increasingly popular, but how effective is it really?What could be easier? You write a 3-line ad, set a budget, and pick some keywords for promoting your ad. Google and Yahoo do the rest! Your ad is automatically placed in the right places, your results are tracked and recorded, and your monthly budget is never exceeded. Pay-per-click (PPC) is an advertisers dream. Or is it?In 2006, Google agreed to a $90 million settlement in response to a class action lawsuit that alleged they hadn't done enough to protect their advertisers from click fraud. Click fraud occurs when someone (usually a competitor) clicks on a PPC ad repeatedly to drive up that advertisers expense or max out their PPC budget, thereby eliminating that particular ad.Make no mistake about it, click fraud exists. Anyone using pay-per-click services or hiring a pay-per-click firm should be aware that this is something that's very difficult to police. You can't count on the search engines to do it for you, or wait around for the next class action suit for your $4.50 credit (that's what Google had to "pay" to each of their advertisers for every $1,000 they had spent). You'll need to monitor your pay-per-click spend very closely. Unless you do, it could be very easy to fall victim to click fraud.Another negative to pay-per-click is the Imagine having at your disposal a means to immediately inform house buyers that you have just the property they are looking for. Potential buyers have given their details and their preferences - imagine that you can send them this information no matter where they are or what they are doing, they can read it at a time that’s convenient and can act accordingly in their own time. Imagine that you can do this quickly and easily, in a matter of minutes, regardless of the number of recipients.

Sounds too good to be true? Well it's not - it's available now, it's inexpensive and you can be taking advantage of it within minutes of reading this article. It's called SMS Text Messaging - and of course you already knew about it didn't you?

From the homebuyer's perspective, SMS is a really convenient way to get information. It's personal and it's discreet. There's immediacy about the message, but at the same time it's not intrusive, and they can handle the response at their convenience.

So you decide that this is a great idea and you want to get your company geared up for the 21st century. How do you get started? Perhaps your first thought is to get your friendly IT Consultant to take a look at the problem, right?

Stop! Don't pick up that phone until you've read the rest of this article. In common with many of these kinds of issues it's easy to get so bogged down in the technicalities that we fail to consider some of the other issues involved.

First of all, let's look at the legalities.

By 31st October 2003, all member states of the European Union will be implementing Article 13 of the Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications (DPEC).A public consultation on how to implement the DPEC in the UK was launched by the DTI on 27 March 2003, and ran for 12 weeks, closing on 19 June 2003. Final implementing Regulations are now being prepared, taking into account the responses received. The DTI intend to publish details of these final measures by mid-September 2003. The new Directive:

Replaces existing definitions for telecommunications services and networks with new definitions for electronic communications and services to ensure technological neutrality and clarify the position of e-mail and use of the internet;

Enables the provision of value added services based on location and traffic data, subject to the consent of subscribers (for example, location based advertising to mobile phone users);

Removes the possibility for a subscriber to be charged for exercising the right not to appear in public directories;

Introduces new information and consent requirements on entries in publicly available directories, including a requirement that subscribers are informed of all the usage possibilities of publicly available directories - e.g. reverse searching from a telephone number in order to obtain a name and address;

Extends controls on unsolicited direct marketing to all forms of electronic communications including unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or Spam) and SMS to mobile telephones; UCE and SMS will be subject to a prior consent requirement, so the receiver is required to agree to it in advance, except in the context of an existing customer relationship, where companies may continue to email or SMS on an 'opt-out' basis;

Clarifies that the Directive does not prevent Member States from introducing provisions on the retention of traffic and location data for law enforcement purposes;

Introduces controls on the use of cookies on websites. Cookies and similar tracking devices will be subject to a new transparency requirement - anyone that employs these kinds of devices must provide information on them and allow subscribers or users to refuse to accept them if they wish.

So what does that mean to the potential implementation of your SMS service? Well, it seems quite clear, we must obtain the recipient's permission before sending any SMS messages "unless there is an existing customer relationship". The exact meaning of "existing customer relationship" is however somewhat of a grey area in the act. For example, if it is interpreted as being someone who has at some time bought a product from the vendor, would that mean that the product being marketed would need to be the same type of product? If this were the case, a supermarket would only be able to send messages about a single line of product to people who have bought that product and would not be able to send messages about other merchandise or services. The DTI's stance on this is that this particular issue is clearly covered in existing UK legislation under the Data Protection Act 1998:-

"These would restrict a business to direct marketing the kind of products the addressee would have reasonably expected it to market at the time they gave or agreed to use of their contact details i.e. a business could market the products available at the time, but not necessarily those of a business that it took over, or a substantively new product range."

So, therefore, it would seem that say a large supermarket chain, who got your name and address, phone number and email details whilst you were a customer buying groceries, should not be legally entitled to begin any form of communication with you using information about you gathered in this way if, for example, they were to start selling Insurance services or indeed start up an Estate Agency business? It would seem so.

So, in most cases, it would appear that your existing customers are open to you being able to send them SMS messages, as it would be reasonable to assume that they would expect you to send them property related information.

There are however other grey areas in the document.

The following is an excerpt from the DTI's document on Article 13:-

"Grey areas under the current rules include the status of systems which send SMS automatically and power dialler-type systems which dial numbers automatically but are designed to establish a voice link with a live operator rather than a pre-recorded message. Lack of certainty about the application of the TDPP (Telecoms Data Protection Directive) Regulations has made it harder to deal with the problems that these kinds of systems can cause. Power diallers, for instance, can cause problems to subscribers where they are used without enough call centre staff available to answer the calls being dialled, resulting in single or repeated silent calls, or calls which cut off after a few rings, in addition to any annoyance caused if they are used to ring subscribers who have registered on the TPS (Telephone Preference Service).

Limiting the definition of automated calling system does not mean that these areas will be unregulated. The sending of unsolicited SMS for advertising purposes is now explicitly covered by the Privacy Directive which treats them in the same way as e-mail messages."

Anyone receiving SMS messages from you should have a clear indication of where the message came from and a clear method to unsubscribe from your service.

It would seem therefore that apart from any other considerations, there are many potential legal pitfalls to setting up your own e-marketing system.

Looking at this from a slightly different perspective, the solution may well be a lot easier than you might expect. From the consumer's angle, the approach to receiving SMS or email messages about products and services is something each of us would rather have much more personal control over. In 1998, my company at the time, Geoworks Corporation, did some extensive focus group research into consumer reaction to e-marketing and in particular SMS. This research was conducted both here in the UK and in the US. At that time, SMS messaging had been available to mobile phone users for a number of years, but we had not acheived the massive volumes that were to be reached in the phenomenon which took place some 12-18 months later when Pay As You Go services sparked huge SMS growth.

To illustrate the point, all of the UK mobile phone companies at this time probably had only one or two SMS Controllers (a computer which handles the storage and routing of SMS messages) in their infrastructure. When the ramp-up suddenly began, the growth caught most of them completely unawares and meant that they had to try and commission new SMSC's faster than the boxes could be ordered! What had been a fairly straight and flat line on a graph suddenly went vertical. Our research at Geoworks indicated that consumers were excited about receiving SMS messages about products or services provided that they were not being charged to receive the message and they had some control over what products and services they were going to receive messages about. "Permission Marketing" was the key - what the consumer wants, when they want it and where they want it. Consumers indicated that they would be happy to receive all kinds of information supported by advertising on the same basis - for example, Weather Information sponsored by X or Football Scores sponsored by Y.

It would seem then, that the key to success in this area is not in the hands of the vendor's innovations or exclusive products, but in giving the consumer control. Without permission, any attempt to sell via this means becomes annoying and intrusive, causing the would-be potential buyer t

g prepared, taking into account the responses received. The DTI intend to publish details of these final measures by mid-September 2003. The new Directive:

Replaces existing definitions for telecommunications services and networks with new definitions for electronic communications and services to ensure technological neutrality and clarify the position of e-mail and use of the internet;

Enables the provision of value added services based on location and traffic data, subject to the consent of subscribers (for example, location based advertising to mobile phone users);

Removes the possibility for a subscriber to be charged for exercising the right not to appear in public directories;

Introduces new information and consent requirements on entries in publicly available directories, including a requirement that subscribers are informed of all the usage possibilities of publicly available directories - e.g. reverse searching from a telephone number in order to obtain a name and address;

Extends controls on unsolicited direct marketing to all forms of electronic communications including unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or Spam) and SMS to mobile telephones; UCE and SMS will be subject to a prior consent requirement, so the receiver is required to agree to it in advance, except in the context of an existing customer relationship, where companies may continue to email or SMS on an 'opt-out' basis;

Clarifies that the Directive does not prevent Member States from introducing provisions on the retention of traffic and location data for law enforcement purposes;

Introduces controls on the use of cookies on websites. Cookies and similar tracking devices will be subject to a new transparency requirement - anyone that employs these kinds of devices must provide information on them and allow subscribers or users to refuse to accept them if they wish.

So what does that mean to the potential implementation of your SMS service? Well, it seems quite clear, we must obtain the recipient's permission before sending any SMS messages "unless there is an existing customer relationship". The exact meaning of "existing customer relationship" is however somewhat of a grey area in the act. For example, if it is interpreted as being someone who has at some time bought a product from the vendor, would that mean that the product being marketed would need to be the same type of product? If this were the case, a supermarket would only be able to send messages about a single line of product to people who have bought that product and would not be able to send messages about other merchandise or services. The DTI's stance on this is that this particular issue is clearly covered in existing UK legislation under the Data Protection Act 1998:-

"These would restrict a business to direct marketing the kind of products the addressee would have reasonably expected it to market at the time they gave or agreed to use of their contact details i.e. a business could market the products available at the time, but not necessarily those of a business that it took over, or a substantively new product range."

So, therefore, it would seem that say a large supermarket chain, who got your name and address, phone number and email details whilst you were a customer buying groceries, should not be legally entitled to begin any form of communication with you using information about you gathered in this way if, for example, they were to start selling Insurance services or indeed start up an Estate Agency business? It would seem so.

So, in most cases, it would appear that your existing customers are open to you being able to send them SMS messages, as it would be reasonable to assume that they would expect you to send them property related information.

There are however other grey areas in the document.

The following is an excerpt from the DTI's document on Article 13:-

"Grey areas under the current rules include the status of systems which send SMS automatically and power dialler-type systems which dial numbers automatically but are designed to establish a voice link with a live operator rather than a pre-recorded message. Lack of certainty about the application of the TDPP (Telecoms Data Protection Directive) Regulations has made it harder to deal with the problems that these kinds of systems can cause. Power diallers, for instance, can cause problems to subscribers where they are used without enough call centre staff available to answer the calls being dialled, resulting in single or repeated silent calls, or calls which cut off after a few rings, in addition to any annoyance caused if they are used to ring subscribers who have registered on the TPS (Telephone Preference Service).

Limiting the definition of automated calling system does not mean that these areas will be unregulated. The sending of unsolicited SMS for advertising purposes is now explicitly covered by the Privacy Directive which treats them in the same way as e-mail messages."

Anyone receiving SMS messages from you should have a clear indication of where the message came from and a clear method to unsubscribe from your service.

It would seem therefore that apart from any other considerations, there are many potential legal pitfalls to setting up your own e-marketing system.

Looking at this from a slightly different perspective, the solution may well be a lot easier than you might expect. From the consumer's angle, the approach to receiving SMS or email messages about products and services is something each of us would rather have much more personal control over. In 1998, my company at the time, Geoworks Corporation, did some extensive focus group research into consumer reaction to e-marketing and in particular SMS. This research was conducted both here in the UK and in the US. At that time, SMS messaging had been available to mobile phone users for a number of years, but we had not acheived the massive volumes that were to be reached in the phenomenon which took place some 12-18 months later when Pay As You Go services sparked huge SMS growth.

To illustrate the point, all of the UK mobile phone companies at this time probably had only one or two SMS Controllers (a computer which handles the storage and routing of SMS messages) in their infrastructure. When the ramp-up suddenly began, the growth caught most of them completely unawares and meant that they had to try and commission new SMSC's faster than the boxes could be ordered! What had been a fairly straight and flat line on a graph suddenly went vertical. Our research at Geoworks indicated that consumers were excited about receiving SMS messages about products or services provided that they were not being charged to receive the message and they had some control over what products and services they were going to receive messages about. "Permission Marketing" was the key - what the consumer wants, when they want it and where they want it. Consumers indicated that they would be happy to receive all kinds of information supported by advertising on the same basis - for example, Weather Information sponsored by X or Football Scores sponsored by Y.

It would seem then, that the key to success in this area is not in the hands of the vendor's innovations or exclusive products, but in giving the consumer control. Without permission, any attempt to sell via this means becomes annoying and intrusive, causing the would-be potential buyer

ccept them if they wish.

So what does that mean to the potential implementation of your SMS service? Well, it seems quite clear, we must obtain the recipient's permission before sending any SMS messages "unless there is an existing customer relationship". The exact meaning of "existing customer relationship" is however somewhat of a grey area in the act. For example, if it is interpreted as being someone who has at some time bought a product from the vendor, would that mean that the product being marketed would need to be the same type of product? If this were the case, a supermarket would only be able to send messages about a single line of product to people who have bought that product and would not be able to send messages about other merchandise or services. The DTI's stance on this is that this particular issue is clearly covered in existing UK legislation under the Data Protection Act 1998:-

"These would restrict a business to direct marketing the kind of products the addressee would have reasonably expected it to market at the time they gave or agreed to use of their contact details i.e. a business could market the products available at the time, but not necessarily those of a business that it took over, or a substantively new product range."

So, therefore, it would seem that say a large supermarket chain, who got your name and address, phone number and email details whilst you were a customer buying groceries, should not be legally entitled to begin any form of communication with you using information about you gathered in this way if, for example, they were to start selling Insurance services or indeed start up an Estate Agency business? It would seem so.

So, in most cases, it would appear that your existing customers are open to you being able to send them SMS messages, as it would be reasonable to assume that they would expect you to send them property related information.

There are however other grey areas in the document.

The following is an excerpt from the DTI's document on Article 13:-

"Grey areas under the current rules include the status of systems which send SMS automatically and power dialler-type systems which dial numbers automatically but are designed to establish a voice link with a live operator rather than a pre-recorded message. Lack of certainty about the application of the TDPP (Telecoms Data Protection Directive) Regulations has made it harder to deal with the problems that these kinds of systems can cause. Power diallers, for instance, can cause problems to subscribers where they are used without enough call centre staff available to answer the calls being dialled, resulting in single or repeated silent calls, or calls which cut off after a few rings, in addition to any annoyance caused if they are used to ring subscribers who have registered on the TPS (Telephone Preference Service).

Limiting the definition of automated calling system does not mean that these areas will be unregulated. The sending of unsolicited SMS for advertising purposes is now explicitly covered by the Privacy Directive which treats them in the same way as e-mail messages."

Anyone receiving SMS messages from you should have a clear indication of where the message came from and a clear method to unsubscribe from your service.

It would seem therefore that apart from any other considerations, there are many potential legal pitfalls to setting up your own e-marketing system.

Looking at this from a slightly different perspective, the solution may well be a lot easier than you might expect. From the consumer's angle, the approach to receiving SMS or email messages about products and services is something each of us would rather have much more personal control over. In 1998, my company at the time, Geoworks Corporation, did some extensive focus group research into consumer reaction to e-marketing and in particular SMS. This research was conducted both here in the UK and in the US. At that time, SMS messaging had been available to mobile phone users for a number of years, but we had not acheived the massive volumes that were to be reached in the phenomenon which took place some 12-18 months later when Pay As You Go services sparked huge SMS growth.

To illustrate the point, all of the UK mobile phone companies at this time probably had only one or two SMS Controllers (a computer which handles the storage and routing of SMS messages) in their infrastructure. When the ramp-up suddenly began, the growth caught most of them completely unawares and meant that they had to try and commission new SMSC's faster than the boxes could be ordered! What had been a fairly straight and flat line on a graph suddenly went vertical. Our research at Geoworks indicated that consumers were excited about receiving SMS messages about products or services provided that they were not being charged to receive the message and they had some control over what products and services they were going to receive messages about. "Permission Marketing" was the key - what the consumer wants, when they want it and where they want it. Consumers indicated that they would be happy to receive all kinds of information supported by advertising on the same basis - for example, Weather Information sponsored by X or Football Scores sponsored by Y.

It would seem then, that the key to success in this area is not in the hands of the vendor's innovations or exclusive products, but in giving the consumer control. Without permission, any attempt to sell via this means becomes annoying and intrusive, causing the would-be potential buyer

expect you to send them property related information.

There are however other grey areas in the document.

The following is an excerpt from the DTI's document on Article 13:-

"Grey areas under the current rules include the status of systems which send SMS automatically and power dialler-type systems which dial numbers automatically but are designed to establish a voice link with a live operator rather than a pre-recorded message. Lack of certainty about the application of the TDPP (Telecoms Data Protection Directive) Regulations has made it harder to deal with the problems that these kinds of systems can cause. Power diallers, for instance, can cause problems to subscribers where they are used without enough call centre staff available to answer the calls being dialled, resulting in single or repeated silent calls, or calls which cut off after a few rings, in addition to any annoyance caused if they are used to ring subscribers who have registered on the TPS (Telephone Preference Service).

Limiting the definition of automated calling system does not mean that these areas will be unregulated. The sending of unsolicited SMS for advertising purposes is now explicitly covered by the Privacy Directive which treats them in the same way as e-mail messages."

Anyone receiving SMS messages from you should have a clear indication of where the message came from and a clear method to unsubscribe from your service.

It would seem therefore that apart from any other considerations, there are many potential legal pitfalls to setting up your own e-marketing system.

Looking at this from a slightly different perspective, the solution may well be a lot easier than you might expect. From the consumer's angle, the approach to receiving SMS or email messages about products and services is something each of us would rather have much more personal control over. In 1998, my company at the time, Geoworks Corporation, did some extensive focus group research into consumer reaction to e-marketing and in particular SMS. This research was conducted both here in the UK and in the US. At that time, SMS messaging had been available to mobile phone users for a number of years, but we had not acheived the massive volumes that were to be reached in the phenomenon which took place some 12-18 months later when Pay As You Go services sparked huge SMS growth.

To illustrate the point, all of the UK mobile phone companies at this time probably had only one or two SMS Controllers (a computer which handles the storage and routing of SMS messages) in their infrastructure. When the ramp-up suddenly began, the growth caught most of them completely unawares and meant that they had to try and commission new SMSC's faster than the boxes could be ordered! What had been a fairly straight and flat line on a graph suddenly went vertical. Our research at Geoworks indicated that consumers were excited about receiving SMS messages about products or services provided that they were not being charged to receive the message and they had some control over what products and services they were going to receive messages about. "Permission Marketing" was the key - what the consumer wants, when they want it and where they want it. Consumers indicated that they would be happy to receive all kinds of information supported by advertising on the same basis - for example, Weather Information sponsored by X or Football Scores sponsored by Y.

It would seem then, that the key to success in this area is not in the hands of the vendor's innovations or exclusive products, but in giving the consumer control. Without permission, any attempt to sell via this means becomes annoying and intrusive, causing the would-be potential buyer

personal control over. In 1998, my company at the time, Geoworks Corporation, did some extensive focus group research into consumer reaction to e-marketing and in particular SMS. This research was conducted both here in the UK and in the US. At that time, SMS messaging had been available to mobile phone users for a number of years, but we had not acheived the massive volumes that were to be reached in the phenomenon which took place some 12-18 months later when Pay As You Go services sparked huge SMS growth.

To illustrate the point, all of the UK mobile phone companies at this time probably had only one or two SMS Controllers (a computer which handles the storage and routing of SMS messages) in their infrastructure. When the ramp-up suddenly began, the growth caught most of them completely unawares and meant that they had to try and commission new SMSC's faster than the boxes could be ordered! What had been a fairly straight and flat line on a graph suddenly went vertical. Our research at Geoworks indicated that consumers were excited about receiving SMS messages about products or services provided that they were not being charged to receive the message and they had some control over what products and services they were going to receive messages about. "Permission Marketing" was the key - what the consumer wants, when they want it and where they want it. Consumers indicated that they would be happy to receive all kinds of information supported by advertising on the same basis - for example, Weather Information sponsored by X or Football Scores sponsored by Y.

It would seem then, that the key to success in this area is not in the hands of the vendor's innovations or exclusive products, but in giving the consumer control. Without permission, any attempt to sell via this means becomes annoying and intrusive, causing the would-be potential buyer to become alienated against the marketer - a self-defeating exercise if ever there was!

So what should be your way forward? Look at other e-marketing success stories for a clue. Amazon.com is, today, a well known and respected seller of books and much more which started from humble roots in the Seattle area and has grown to be a worldwide $multi-million success. Amazon's success was based on giving you, the consumer, control and providing a top-class next-day service. You control from the comfort of your home or office, the parameters that determine what you get from Amazon. It's easy and convenient, and grew like topsy. Ebay is another example - providing a worldwide auction service. Many other services provide 'Portal' access for the consumer to select what information they wish to receive.

So it seems Portal services are the key to gaining the hearts and minds of the consumer. But as an Estate Agent, how does that help?

A Portal could provide a single access point for would-be housebuyers to register their interest in properties by locale, price and number of bedrooms. The consumer controls what they want to get. It is open to all Estate Agents who can register, quickly and easily, any property that is going on the market. Any technical or legal issues are the responsibility of the Portal and not of the individual Estate Agent.

From the consumer perspective, it’s one place to go, they register once, but potentially get messages from many Estate Agencies provided that they match their criteria. It's free to the consumer, and they have control to change their criteria or unsubscribe should they wish.