Tags |
|
|
Links |
|
|
Write You - The Murder of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5 -- Promoting Fear When Perfect Love Just Won't Do
A serodiscordant relationship is that relationship in which one partner is HIV positive and the other is HIV negative. It is a relationship that involves a lot of emotions and anxieties. When in a relationship a partner is aware of being infected with a disease that could cause death, brings in a lot of anxieties. It is obvious not only at the time of diagnosis but throughout the relationship.The serodiscordant relationship undergoes a number of difficulties. Such a relationship is under constant threat of infecting the partner who is HIV negative when you have sexual relationship. There is always the fear of either infecting or being infected by the partner. The fear is natural as none would like to harm either of the partners. More than the issue of HIV there are other issues that need to be faced and discussed. In many serodiscordant relationships the negative partner can take care of the positive, but it could not always be taken in a positive way by the HIV infected partner as a feeling of dependence.In a serodiscordant relationship it is very difficult for the HIV infected person to tell the sexual partner about the HIV infection. There are a number of questions and thoughts going continuously in the mind, such as how to tell the partner about being HIV positive? What will my partner think about me? Will I be accepted or rejected? And many other such related questions. The infected person has to be honest with the partner. Although it is a difficult and complex task but the person has to be brave enough to tell the truth. If he or she feels it impossible the infected person can take help of the doctor or the AIDS organization.The person with HIV infection in such a relationship may also feel estranged within the relationship. The partner could feel this due to internal emotions of being infected by such a disease and constantly being under the pressure of harming the partner as well. Moreover t
Remember, this is the Peter who denied Jesus three times wit
Do Traffic Exchanges really work? They sure do! By following the steps outlined in this article, to the letter, you will learn how to use Traffic Exchanges effectively.Step 1: Join the Top 10 Traffic Exchange programs. Now with all the Exchanges out there and new ones popping up daily, how do you know the top 10? That's easy! You will find this information by using a great tool available to you for free, that will keep you current on the Top 10. This site is updated every Tuesday, giving you the information you need to be sure you are working the best Exchanges to promote your business. (more on this in a bit) We will call this tool your main program.Step 2: Once you have joined the Main Program, sign up for the Top 10 Exchanges listed and follow the instructions given exactly. As you join each Exchange, make note of the ID# or username for each as you will need to have that handy.Step 3: Now that you have completed the signup process in Step 2, it's time to set up your individual Exchanges and start driving traffic to your website. On each exchange you will need to add your URL for the business you are promoting to have it included in the rotation of websites other surfers are viewing. You will also add a second URL and that is the link to the Main Program you set up in Step 1. Why? Because by adding the URL of the Main Program, to be included in the rotation, you are referring others to all your Traffic Exchange referral links for the Top 10 that you have joined. As others sign up through your referral links, you will receive credits from each Exchange for the referral and additional credits every time one of your personally sponsored members surfs the Exchange. This will become your surfing team so to speak, and the more credits your team earns the more you can promote your own website.Step 4: Getting set up to surf and earn new credits. Until you have enough members on your team adding cr
Acts 2:44-45
And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
Acts 4:32
And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
Nothing wrong with this I suppose, but one would think it was rather voluntary and something that people do when they wish to drop out of society and cling unto only those that see the world as they do. It's an early practice in any group like this which tends to break down after time and everyone goes their own way again, or at least does not feel the need to share their hard earned resources and support the loners forever.
But one has to ask why this story was included in the Book of Acts? Ask yourself what might be the result today of this happening in your church! What's wrong with this story and I will call it a story as I do not personally believe it ever really happened, but I do believe it had the desired effect on the “Church.”
Acts 5
1Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. 2With his wife's full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles' feet.
Comment: It was their property and they had the right to sell it for as much as they wished. It was nice that Ananias had such an open and trusting relationship with his wife, Sapphira, that he included her in how much he actually sold it for. While the “rules” called for everyone to share and share alike, no one has the right, save in that culture or in the “Church” it seem, to demand ALL of it. Keeping your own money for yourself is no crime on earth or in heaven. And anyone has the right to change their mind about contributions to anyone. He brought “the rest” and that seems generous enough under any circumstances. “Putting it at the Apostles Feet” seems contrived, but if he literally did and Peter stood there whenever members brought in the goodies and shekels to be placed at his feet is this not an arrogant position that he has assumed for himself? I picture Peter standing at the front of the room standing like Mr. Clean, which of course he wasn't, receiving these required contributions.
Remember, this is the Peter who denied Jesus three times with
What a wonderful time to be the President of the United States! If you are President, you are king. You can spend a trillion dollars of other people's money and thousands of lives, to hunt down one personal enemy. You can do it in the name of freedom and democracy. Any who might get in your way will pat you on the back and say; "Go get em". You can do it in the name of God, which makes it good. King George looked upon all he had created and it was very good."Woe unto those who call good evil and evil good." Woe unto those who can no longer tell the difference. King George knows the difference. Anything he does with a stated good intention is good, no matter what the immediate and long term outcome. No matter what or who it costs. Are you low on self esteem? Borrow some from the king. He has more than the rest of us combined. He is the good tree and he produces only good fruit. Won't you take a bite? Go ahead. Eat - For these are the end of times and we will get fooled again.A new world outpost is founded upon the idea of freedom and shared responsibility. True to historical roots, it soon goes whoring for money and power. It is successful in ways the world had never seen. It creates war for nearly every generation. It creates obscene debt and consolidates the money and power. It makes kings and it destroys them. It teaches its children that all it does is very good. War is good, money is good, and spending for today is good. Consolidating economic power in ever fewer hands is good; that all servants will eventually have but one master.Evil is any and all that interferes with this process. We deserve nothing but the first and very best of everything. Hell, we deserve all of every good thing. They deserve less than what they have and none of what we have. We build monuments to our great goodness. If evil befalls us in any way, it is unjust. We do nothing that deserves punishm
Nothing wrong with this I suppose, but one would think it was rather voluntary and something that people do when they wish to drop out of society and cling unto only those that see the world as they do. It's an early practice in any group like this which tends to break down after time and everyone goes their own way again, or at least does not feel the need to share their hard earned resources and support the loners forever.
But one has to ask why this story was included in the Book of Acts? Ask yourself what might be the result today of this happening in your church! What's wrong with this story and I will call it a story as I do not personally believe it ever really happened, but I do believe it had the desired effect on the “Church.”
Acts 5
1Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. 2With his wife's full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles' feet.
Comment: It was their property and they had the right to sell it for as much as they wished. It was nice that Ananias had such an open and trusting relationship with his wife, Sapphira, that he included her in how much he actually sold it for. While the “rules” called for everyone to share and share alike, no one has the right, save in that culture or in the “Church” it seem, to demand ALL of it. Keeping your own money for yourself is no crime on earth or in heaven. And anyone has the right to change their mind about contributions to anyone. He brought “the rest” and that seems generous enough under any circumstances. “Putting it at the Apostles Feet” seems contrived, but if he literally did and Peter stood there whenever members brought in the goodies and shekels to be placed at his feet is this not an arrogant position that he has assumed for himself? I picture Peter standing at the front of the room standing like Mr. Clean, which of course he wasn't, receiving these required contributions.
Remember, this is the Peter who denied Jesus three times wit
Politics is the cup of tea that not everyone can have any time any where especially if you are somewhere in India. This is because a trend has been established in this country by the erstwhile first prime-minister of India namely Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, the Cambridge educated barrister. Though till date there are a whole lot of people who swear by his charms and popularity. Nehruji was born at a time when this country was ruled by the British. Things were not as easy as it is today 60 years after the Indian independence. Indians were not given any respect or the deserved dignity in their own country. Somewhere near a church in Himachal Pradesh in India, it was written this way "Indians and Dogs not allowed".You can understand the treatment meted out to these poor people. However with time many Indians rose to greater heights especially in politics, just because the people started sending their sons and daughters to England for further studies and most probably as barristers. Nehruji and his father were one among this new awakened and educated group. Hence people started joining active politics mainly to over throw the British Empire. Nehruji was arrested many times along with others for the freedom struggle. Finally on August 15 1947, India became independent and Nehruji was sworn in as the first PM of Independent India. He continued in the same post till his death in 1964. However he left a strange legacy behind him of making the family members assume the same posts and this is continued till now.Personally I have nothing against the Nehruian trend moving on but for the inefficient person who occupy important post because his family member earlier occupied it. This is not good for the national development. It greatly hampers the progress of the nation and instead brings in a greater degradation. This can result in more poverty, communal strives and many to say. So the people should become more aware of these f
But one has to ask why this story was included in the Book of Acts? Ask yourself what might be the result today of this happening in your church! What's wrong with this story and I will call it a story as I do not personally believe it ever really happened, but I do believe it had the desired effect on the “Church.”
Acts 5
1Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. 2With his wife's full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles' feet.
Comment: It was their property and they had the right to sell it for as much as they wished. It was nice that Ananias had such an open and trusting relationship with his wife, Sapphira, that he included her in how much he actually sold it for. While the “rules” called for everyone to share and share alike, no one has the right, save in that culture or in the “Church” it seem, to demand ALL of it. Keeping your own money for yourself is no crime on earth or in heaven. And anyone has the right to change their mind about contributions to anyone. He brought “the rest” and that seems generous enough under any circumstances. “Putting it at the Apostles Feet” seems contrived, but if he literally did and Peter stood there whenever members brought in the goodies and shekels to be placed at his feet is this not an arrogant position that he has assumed for himself? I picture Peter standing at the front of the room standing like Mr. Clean, which of course he wasn't, receiving these required contributions.
Remember, this is the Peter who denied Jesus three times wit
The world of weight loss and fitness is certainly vast, and the American consumer can absolutely get lost in the thousands of easy effortless and ostly useless ads if not careful. With my books and research I want to clear the air about the various myths and false statements regarding our health and fitness that have clearly muddied the waters for many Americans.What I want to stress in particular is that there is no magic answer, potion, or diet pill that is going to make everything better. The ad on TV where the pretty lady says "it's easy. you'll love it", is appealing to our need for instant gratification with no effort. We don't want to hear the facts so we continue to look for the instant solution. If there was a magic diet pill, or diet plan, over 60% of Americans wouldn't be overweight, in spite of spending over $35 billion annually on diet products.Achieving weight loss and fitness requires a commitment on your part to strive for a healthier you. What you will get in return for all of your hard work and dedication is a fit body, a renewed clarity of mind, better quality sleep, and perhaps even a pronounced increase in your libido. I have found that through the positive changes I have made in my own life regarding weight loss and fitness, all areas of my life are exponentially better.I wake up energized, I feel excited about my day and my interactions with people, my body feels strong and capable, and my entire outlook on life has improved significantly.The Weight Loss and Fitness Commitment show that claims that teach you shortcuts on how to drop 30 pounds in 30 days are improbable at best and unhelathy at worst.That claim is water loss pure and simple. You do the math: 1 pound of fat = about 3500 calories 30 pounds of fat = 105,000 calories. To lose 30 pounds of fat in 30 days you would need to reduce caloric intake by about 105,000 calories or about
Comment: It was their property and they had the right to sell it for as much as they wished. It was nice that Ananias had such an open and trusting relationship with his wife, Sapphira, that he included her in how much he actually sold it for. While the “rules” called for everyone to share and share alike, no one has the right, save in that culture or in the “Church” it seem, to demand ALL of it. Keeping your own money for yourself is no crime on earth or in heaven. And anyone has the right to change their mind about contributions to anyone. He brought “the rest” and that seems generous enough under any circumstances. “Putting it at the Apostles Feet” seems contrived, but if he literally did and Peter stood there whenever members brought in the goodies and shekels to be placed at his feet is this not an arrogant position that he has assumed for himself? I picture Peter standing at the front of the room standing like Mr. Clean, which of course he wasn't, receiving these required contributions.
Remember, this is the Peter who denied Jesus three times wit
Service Technology Professionalism Cost Location Service. Can your new provider handle your unique needs? You can only ask. But don’t just take their word. Ask for references in your size and type of business. Smaller providers may only be able to get close but that is OK. You’re concerned about how, not what, service is provided. Ask the references for other reference back to the provided that they did not provide you with. That is where you may get your best information. But in all fairness, remember the old adage “You can’t make all of the people happy all of the time.”Technology. Is the provider up to date on payroll technology? It is hard for the major payroll providers to upgrade a system for hundreds of thousands of users. They will always be slower to change just because of size and inertia. The very small payroll service providers can’t afford the newest technology. You also don’t want bleeding edge technology just leading edge. Currently (and this changes all the time) you want to talk about paperless payroll, online payroll, payroll debit cards and employee self-service. There are other topics that will apply to your unique circumstances.Professionalism. How long as the company been in business? Are they a fly-by-night outfit and will disappear with your tax deposits. Do they have standing in the community? Are they an EFTPS batch filer meaning they have at least 100 clients they file tax deposits for?Do they have qualified payroll professionals and CPAs on staff to handle problems? You will have dealings with the IRS if nothing else over mistakes that the IRS makes. Without a CPA on staff you will either have to deal with the IRS yourself or pay your regular CPA to handle the problem. If your CPA does not deal with payroll tax problems on a regular basis it will be time consum
Remember, this is the Peter who denied Jesus three times with three lies of never having known the man and was forgiven in John 21, when John thought Peter was better left off the roster of Apostles worth anything to the Church. Seems at this point of his career, Peter was not much in the mood to forgive as he had been forgiven or follow any of Jesus teachings on the topic. I'd say Peter had given Jesus lots of reasons to knock him off early in the disciple game too.
3Then Peter said, "Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? 4Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to men but to God."
Comment: “Satan” could be anyone or anything. This can merely mean that Ananias made his own decision about how much he could afford to contribute. It's not like he was sharing his days wage for making pots down the street. This would have been a chunk of family change and perhaps land that had been in his family for generations. I once went to a store in Jerusalem that was in a cave of sorts and the owner said that the cave and using it for commerce had been in his family for over 800 years!
Whenever someone makes a decision the church or minister does not like or think is the right one, “Satan” often is named as the cause for this. It often means that the person simply does not see things the way the minister or church does on this topic. Besides if a literal Satan filled his heart, then forgive him and go after Satan! I always found it difficult to resist as a mere human when a rogue spirit that had access to God and was part of God's plan for testing humans was unleashed on me. I mean, come on here, human is human! I can't even resist chocolate. So at least we see it was their's to give, and somewhere along the line, what he said he would give and what he gave was the problem in Peter's mind. The lie is not in not giving it all, the lie seems to be in saying he'd give it all and then not doing that. Again, would Peter, who denied Jesus three times remember, with three lies, in a very short time, not understand his own past in t
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.writeyou.net/article/301099/writeyou-The-Murder-of-Ananias-and-Sapphira-in-Acts-5--Promoting-Fear-When-Perfect-Love-Just-Wont-Do.html">The Murder of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5 -- Promoting Fear When Perfect Love Just Won't Do</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.writeyou.net/article/301099/writeyou-The-Murder-of-Ananias-and-Sapphira-in-Acts-5--Promoting-Fear-When-Perfect-Love-Just-Wont-Do.html]The Murder of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5 -- Promoting Fear When Perfect Love Just Won't Do[/url]
Related Articles:
3 Steps to Quickly Writing Ezine Articles
A Discussion About The XM8 Gun
Bookmark it:
|